The MG Gundam F91 has been upgraded after 12 years and released as Ver. 2.0. The 2006 MG Gundam F91 was the first MG to use a polycap-less design — an experimental kit built entirely with ABS joints and no polycaps at all. It had its own merits, but the assembly feel and joint movement were so stiff that it got harder and harder to recommend as time went on.
Bandai apparently recognized internally that those stiff ABS joints were a failure, because afterward they went back to using at least some polycaps and switched to softer-feeling joint materials instead of ABS. That's likely why this full renewal as v2.0 happened — though honestly, it feels less like it was driven by market demand and more like the developers wanted to redeem themselves (?). Anyway, since this is a version-up kit, here's a rundown of what's been improved over the 1.0:
- Assembly feel and joint movement are clearly improved, delivering both smooth articulation and solid joint strength.
- The rear leg three-stage thruster covers now have a linked gimmick where opening the top cover causes the rest to follow.
- The beam saber storage on the side skirt has been redesigned to open up much more cleanly.
- A linked cylinder has been added to the left arm beam shield deploy gimmick (the cylinder itself doesn't move).
- The shoulder cooling fin deploy mechanism has been improved for easier deployment.
- Both a swappable mask head and a transforming head are included — a nice touch.
- Color separation issues that didn't match the design specs (front skirt area, etc.) have been corrected, and additional color separation has been added (beam shield, etc.).
- LED lighting gimmick added via the dedicated stand (LED sold separately).
- The grip feel when holding weapons has improved thanks to the separate finger parts and their attachment gimmick.
As you can see, there are signs of genuine effort put into this renewal throughout the kit. That said, there are also areas where it's actually worse than the 1.0:
- Overall articulation is inferior to the 1.0 (the 1.0 could fold the limbs in completely)
- The newly added hip joint extension gimmick is awkward to use and barely makes a noticeable difference
- The rear skirt bazooka mounting gimmick looks flashier now but holds worse than before
- The 1.0 included a Rafflesia stand that let you recreate a diorama scene.
- Unlike the 1.0 which had a full-body frame, the 2.0 requires some armor parts to be attached for the frame structure to hold together. The frame detail is also slightly more simplified.
- The beam shield, which had a double gradient finish on the 1.0, has been simplified to a single flat color.
So while there are points where this version-up is actually a step backward, overall it does feel like a genuine upgrade. At the very least, the assembly feel and joint movement — which were the biggest complaints about the 1.0 — have been clearly and cleanly improved. Beyond that, various small gimmicks have been upgraded as mentioned above, though some of them ended up worse than if they'd just left them alone.
The most questionable part is probably the hip joint gimmick. It's a new mechanism where you lower the front skirt to create clearance, then rotate the entire hip joint forward by 45 degrees to raise the legs higher. But actually deploying this gimmick requires carefully holding various parts of the body and gently prying things apart, which is a hassle — and after all that effort, the effect is surprisingly minimal. As you can see in the photos above, even with the hip joint pulled out as far as it'll go, the kneeling pose still doesn't look natural. The 1.0's kneeling pose is honestly much more stable.
On top of that, the upgraded bazooka mounting gimmick actually holds worse than before, and the overall limb articulation falls short of the 1.0, so the kit's dynamic posing potential is noticeably behind its predecessor. In the end, it's hard to call this a perfect upgrade — it's probably best to appreciate it simply for the fact that the joint issues, which were the biggest problem with the 1.0, have been definitively fixed.
Setting aside the version-up aspect and just looking at it as a standalone MG kit, the build experience is excellent, the overall package is solid, and it delivers decent articulation and joint strength. The gimmick precision in particular puts it among the top tier of MG kits, so there are definitely plenty of fun points to enjoy here.
You can also use the included stand with the separately sold 2-point LED unit (¥2,000) to create a light-up effect on the body. The front torso ducts and rear verniers glow beautifully. In terms of LED effect, it's clearly a step above previous kits that simply lit up the cockpit or eyes.
To wrap things up — the articulation and joint issues that were the biggest letdowns in the 1.0 have been definitively resolved, and despite a few shortcomings, the gimmick execution is highly polished, making this a much more worthwhile purchase. If you're an F91 fan, this is a must-build even if you've already done the 1.0, and it's also an easy recommendation for anyone who just wants a clean, up-to-date MG build without anything too out of the ordinary. :-)
| Category | Rating | Analysis |
| Seam Lines | ★★★★★ | Cleanly resolved with an extensive use of slide molds |
| Molding Color / Color Separation | ★★★★★ | Slightly improved color separation |
| Proportions | ★★★★★
| Good, but not much different from the 1.0. |
| Articulation | ★★★★ | Articulation is actually worse than the 1.0. The hip expansion gimmick is basically pointless. |
| Joint Strength | ★★★★★★ | Noticeably smoother and sturdier articulation compared to the 1.0 |
| Internal Frame | ★★★★☆ | Precise, but calling it a full-body frame is a bit of a stretch |
| Detail | ★★★★★ | Clean and refined detailing |
| Weapons / Accessories | ★★★★★★ | Solid on the basics. LED-compatible stand included. Gimmicks galore. |
| Parts Count / Price | ★★★★★ | 352 parts total. 88 parts per ¥1,000. Pretty good value for money. |
| Uniqueness | ★★★★★ | Not perfect, but it's definitely an upgrade. |
| Dalong's Point : 101 pts. |
* The scoring system used only for MG has been carried over from First 1.0 twenty years ago,
so applying it uniformly even to the latest kits — whose quality has leveled up across the board — is honestly a bit ambiguous.
Since it's just my personal take and can't clearly capture the differences in kit quality over the years,
please don't read too much into it and just use it as a loose reference.
(For kits scoring above 100, take it to mean the quality is much better than kits of the past.)
MG Gundam F91 Ver.2.0 | 2018. 5 | ¥4,400
AIThis page was translated by Claude Sonnet.